Draft TCP Code takes a beating

The jungle drums are sending negative messages about the new TCP Code proposed by Communications Alliance.  If the rumours are correct, ACMA is on the verge of refusing to register the draft Code, opting for more aggressive legislative regulation of the telco industry instead.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 1 }

Mythbuster: ‘Entire agreement’ clauses lock out misrepresentation claims

People are often confused about the effect of clauses that say ‘You acknowledge that we have made no other promises or representations to you.’

Often you see such clauses quoted in support of an argument that a claim for misrepresentation cannot succeed where a contract contains this clause.

But that ain’t necessarily so.  In fact, it ain’t even normally so.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 0 }

CSP Central Update

Happy New Year!

We are currently working on a new and improved CSPCentral and hope to relaunch during 2012.

Feel free to contact us with any queries.

Best Wishes

The CSPCentral Team

Comments { 0 }

ACCC takes aim at mobile internet

The ACCC has announced the launch of an Information Paper entitled “Mobile and Other Wireless Internet Speed Claims and the Trade Practices Act 1974″.

The Information Paper has been developed to assist ISPs and Telcos in ensuring that their advertising for mobile and wireless internet is compliant with the Trade Practices Act 1974, and in particular the consumer protection provisions such as s52.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 0 }

ACCC executes perfect hit on Telstra, Optus and Vodafone

obeyAfter months of secret negotiations, Telstra, Optus & Voda have rolled over and ‘offered’ ACCC a court enforceable undertaking … equivalent to court injunctions … to stamp out false advertising in the broadband and telephony industry.

When legal advisers warn second and third tier telcos and ISPs about advertising content, the single most common retort is ‘Telstra gets away with it’ and ‘We saw an Optus ad like that’ and ‘But Voda says the same thing’.

It’s a pretty good argument.  If the giants can do it, why can’t we ?

No mistake, this is the biggest telco-truth-in-advertising hit ever landed by the national regulator.  Like all good commando raids, it seemed to come from nowhere.  Only yesterday morning did rumours start to circulate that ‘something big’ was coming out of Canberra in the next 24 hours.

If Tiers 2, 3 & 4 don’t get their act together now, they can’t complain they’re being picked on.  And ACCC has made sure that Telstra, Optus & Voda are motivated to keep their networks honest.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 3 }

Senate Committee rubber stamps draft unfair contracts law

approvedThe Senate Standing Committee on Economics has received, and noted, strong submissions that part of the proposed new unfair contracts law can’t be right. 

But so what ?  The Committee majority finds no fault with the reasoning of law Professor Frank Zumbo, or the Consumer Action Law Centre … but it has still rubber stamped the Bill, virtually guaranteeing its passage into law.

And yes, the problem wording is the part we described as the Bill’s ‘bonkers bit’ back in June 2009.  It’s disappointing that the Senate Committee system hasn’t been able to deliver a sensible outcome.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 1 }

Chariot fined $10,000 for failing to lodge eligible revenue return

aussie-bucksOK, that’s a March 2006 headline, but it makes the point:  failing to comply with the approaching 28 September deadline for carriers to lodge their annual Eligible Revenue Return is not a good idea.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 0 }

ISPs: Be careful what you say to media about copyright case

secretOnline tech magazine IT News could have inadvertently lured ISPs into legal disaster with a recent article on copyright issues

By publishing broadband provider comments about legal advice they may have obtained, the mag could have led them to waive the right to keep the details secret.

It’s vital for CSPs to understand the risk they may create if they publicly refer to legal advice they have received.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 0 }

Web Ace aced by ACMA

565459_vampireThe Australian Communications and Media Authority has flexed its Telecommunications Act muscles against ISP Web Ace, directing it to comply with the billing rules under the Telecommunications Consumer Protections Code.

Web Ace is the trading name of Jason Kenneth McKay of Perth, WA.  ACMA says that McKay has been extracting payments from customer credit cards without authority, and failing to refund.

The issue was first publicised on Whirlpool, the Australian internet users’ town square.  In May 2008, Whirlpool user ‘yabbitboy’ posted:

I am signed up to webace’s email only plan ( $60 a year ), I get unauthorized billings by webace 4 times already, 4*$60. I had contacted them by email – never got replied and also tried contacting them by phone – I do speak to them by person to person but they said they are ‘busy’ and say they will call me back which is *******.

ACMA has now used its power to direct McKay not to extract payments without issuing a bill and in accordance with customer authorisation.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 1 }

Bank of Queensland finances telco scam

1151304_no_liesFinance companies are racing against time to squeeze money out of Australian small businesses before a major Federal Court case shows that their contracts are unenforceable.

Two separate groups of telco companies promoted the notorious telco equipment / finance / servces bundling scam that has cheated businesses of millions of dollars, saddling them with massive debt for goods and services never supplied.  One of these groups has been taken to court by ACCC, which is determined to smash its illegal conduct.

Continue Reading →

Comments { 5 }