iiNet supremo Michael Malone has given the clearest indication yet of the company’s detailed defence to AFACT’s copyright action against it.
Writing on Whirlpool, Australian broadband’s town square, Malone laid down the law: ‘We have yet to receive any independently verified notice that show (sic) that a customer has actually infringed.’
His statement goes on to make it clear that iiNet will argue that an ISP is never obliged to discipline a user for peer-to-peer copyright infringement allegations unless they have been declared an infringer by a court; evidence that falls short of a court finding does not give an ISP any obligation to act.
An ACT court has allowed court documents to be served on two defendants through a notification posted on their Facebook pages.
When the ACCC suspects a CSP is breaching the Trade Practices Act with unacceptable advertising, one of its main weapons is to issue a ‘
Who doesn’t have a story about a time they received an email with dozens of people identified in the to: or cc: field, when they obviously should have been in the bcc: field ?
It’s amazing that CSPs with the turnover of TPG still produce seriously illegal advertising and contracts.
We 
Loading ...
Recent Comments