Lawyers release copyright Safe Harbour kit
News of legal action against ISP iiNet for alleged copyright breach has provoked every reaction from ‘What nonsense!’ to ‘The sky is falling!’
Of course, everyone is entitled to their own opinion – including the army of ‘bush lawyers’ on Whirlpool.
But that doesn’t change the fact that a prudent ISP needs to understand how to bring itself inside the copyright ‘safe harbour’ rules.
Lawyers Logie-Smith Lanyon have provided a solution with their ISP Copyright Safe Harbour Kit, a detailed info-pack that’s essential reading for every Australian ISP. Download contents and sample pages.
iiNet Case: Why the ‘judge, jury and executioner’ argument is wrong
iiNet and many of its supporters argue that the company cannot terminate users on the basis of mere allegations, and can’t play ‘judge, jury and executioner’.
Nice try, but legally misses the point of the Copyright Act.
iiNet case: The three legal questions that matter
The internet is awash with comment on the copyright infringement action by Village Roadshow and others against iiNet.
When all is said and done, the court has to decide three legal questions.
In this article, CSP Central helps you to focus on the real issues.
Film heavyweights sue iiNet for copyright infringement
Breaking News: A host of major film studios and Channel 7 have today launched legal proceedings in the Federal Court against iiNet alleging copyright infringement.
The studios are claiming that iiNet infringed copyright by not stopping iiNet customers from using BitTorrent to infringe the studios’ copyright in their respective films.
Under Australian law, a person can be liable for infringement if he or she ‘authorises’ another person to infringe copyright.
ISPs and copyright enforcement – let’s remember the facts
International copyright owners are calling on Aussie ISPs to support a UK-style self-regulatory scheme for disciplining alleged copyright breachers.
But the scheme is at odds with the US approach to the same problem, and Australia four years ago decided to follow the US model. Why would local ISPs volunteer for a hybrid solution now, just because some elements of the UK system suit some stakeholders better ?
Recent Posts
Categories
- ACCC
- ACMA
- advertising
- Australian Consumer Law
- Code compliance
- Competition and Consumer Act
- copyright
- CSG
- DNCR Act
- Employment issues
- Funnytel
- General
- How not to do it
- iiNet Case
- Making sense of contracts
- Mythbusters
- New laws
- New laws
- Privacy
- Spam Act
- Spot Check
- Telecommunications Act
- Telstra
- TIO
- Trade Practices Act
- Uncategorized






Recent Comments